The Thereby Series: The Deadline-Averse Dilemma and Chuck’s Blind Spot

Some team members wear their “I don’t need deadlines” badge like honor.

It’s not honor.

It’s friction.

Because for every self-styled free-roamer who claims deadlines are unnecessary, there’s a trail of burnt-out colleagues doing the emotional labor of guessing, reminding, and filling in the gaps.

They confuse flexibility with freedom.

But freedom without form is chaos.

It’s exhausting.

The team carries an unspoken tax.

They pay in uncertainty.

In hesitation.

In second-guessing when something will be done—or if it will be done at all.

And here’s where Chuck comes in.

Chuck, the leader who believes that proactive communication, time ownership, and calendar accountability are “too soft” for real training.

Chuck is wrong.

Because deadlines are trust contracts.

And trust, when left untrained, withers.

Part conversations—those brief, honest exchanges where you nudge clarity forward—aren’t fluff.

They further fortify your company culture.

Time management is creative integrity.

When Chuck says, “That’s just not my style,” what he’s really saying is, “I’m okay with the slow rot of underperformance.”

He’s teaching the team to tolerate delay.

To normalize guessing.

To accept friction as fate.

But what if friction isn’t fate?

What if it’s just poor formatting of expectations?

The best organizations don’t wait for accountability to show up.

They teach it.

They ritualize it.

They coach it into the bones of the culture.

Because calendars don’t kill creativity.

They multiply it.

“Structure is not the enemy of freedom. It’s the soil it grows in.” — Mike Brewer

Leave a Reply