Shane Parrish
Automating Virtue: How Shane Parrish’s Decision-making Frameworks Shape Exceptional Leadership
![](https://multifamilycollective.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Frameworks-for-Multifamily-Leadership-1024x683.jpg)
Photo by Dayne Topkin on Unsplash
Automatic rules, popularized in Shane Parrish’s work on decision-making frameworks, can profoundly impact business outcomes and personal development in character-building. To the multifamily leadership and business professionals striving for moral and ethical fortitude, employing these rules could offer a potent formula for integrity, consistency, and, consequently, enduring success.
Shane Parrish is a renowned thinker in decision-making and mental models. His work, often featured on Farnam Street, provides roadmaps for clear thinking and better decisions. But what if we took the principle of automatic rules, often applied to finance or risk assessment, and aimed it at character-building in leadership?
Automatic rules are pre-set responses or actions to recurring situations or decisions. These rules reduce cognitive load, eliminate decision fatigue, and increase efficiency in decision-making. Imagine applying this idea to construct a moral compass for multifamily leaders—your choices become swifter and consistently ethical. Instead of deliberating every moral dilemma, leaders can rely on these ‘virtue scripts’ to guide them.
Ethical Filters for Multifamily Leaders
Moral principles can be streamlined into automatic rules for multifamily leaders. For example, consider a situation where you’re facing a complex contractual decision involving multiple stakeholders. An automatic rule here could be: “Never engage in an agreement where one party gains at the unethical loss of another.” It’s an extreme example, but the rule is instant, and so is your decision, saving valuable time and preserving integrity. It bypasses the ethical noise, honing in on the actionable virtue.
Reputation Capital
Operating with strong ethical rules contributes to accumulating what might be called “reputation capital.” As renters flock to well-managed properties, stakeholders and collaborators will gravitate toward leaders with a reputation for fair dealing and ethical rigor. Over time, this reputation capital becomes a competitive advantage, both a magnet for high-quality partnerships and a moat against public relations disasters.
Real-world Applications and Technological Leverage
Here’s where it gets fascinating. Emerging PropTech solutions can help institutionalize these scripts within your business systems. Imagine a machine-learning algorithm trained to flag potentially unethical contractual clauses, alerting you before finalizing an agreement. Essentially, we’re talking about using advanced technology to ‘outsource’ virtue, creating an additional layer of ethical scrutiny.
Contrarian Outlook: Can Virtue Be Automated?
A provocative question looms: can ethical and moral decisions be boiled down to automatic rules? While controversial, the point here isn’t to substitute human judgment but to augment it. Having an automatic rule doesn’t negate the value of a considered decision; it simply offers a failsafe, a baseline of ethical action upon which more nuanced choices can be made.
- Farnam Street Blog: Shane Parrish on Decision-making
- Discussion on Automatic Rules: Automatic Rules in Decision-making
Share this:
Unlocking Deeper Insights: The ‘And Then What?’ Strategy for Multifamily Leaders
![](https://multifamilycollective.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Questions-for-Multifamily-1024x683.jpg)
Photo by Towfiqu barbhuiya on Unsplash
As a business leader, there is a need for thoughtful decision-making. Leaders must avoid surface-level thinking and foster a culture of deep understanding and critical examination. Easy to say, very hard to develop the discipline. One transformative question that can alter how professionals in this space approach problems is: “And then what?” This method, inspired by Shane Parrish’s work, advocates for pushing beyond initial conclusions and diving deeper into the ramifications of our decisions.
At face value, multifamily leadership might see a solution as the endpoint. You identify a challenge, put a pure definition to the problem, brainstorm, find a solution, and implement it. However, by stopping at the first solution, leaders might miss out on unforeseen consequences or even better alternatives. That’s where the “And then what?” strategy comes into play.
When you pose the question, “And then what?” after arriving at a potential solution, you compel yourself and your team to forecast beyond the immediate; for multifamily leaders, this can mean the difference between a successful strategy and one with unintended negative impacts. For example, if considering a new technology solution to streamline operations, it’s tempting to adopt it based on initial benefits. However, asking “And then what?” might reveal potential integration issues with existing systems or perhaps a need for significant team training, impacting productivity in the short term.
This questioning strategy also promotes human-centric leadership, which I consider key in multifamily. By continually asking, “And then what?” leaders are pushed to consider the human consequences of their decisions. Will the new strategy alienate certain team members? Could it unintentionally create more work or stress for particular roles?
Furthermore, embracing the “And then what?” approach fosters an environment of continuous learning and innovation. It challenges conventional wisdom, compelling teams to explore contrarian ideas or new technologies that might offer more effective or efficient solutions.
The beauty of this approach is its simplicity. It doesn’t require extensive training or the adoption of new technologies. It’s a mindset, a commitment to thorough examination and forward-thinking. It’s an invaluable tool for multifamily leaders to tease out human potential.