communication in leadership
Transform Your Leadership: The Surprising Power of “We” Over “I”
Photo by Bekky Bekks on Unsplash
The subtle shift from using “I” statements to “We” statements can profoundly impact team dynamics, morale, and overall productivity. This linguistic change, seemingly minor, carries with it a powerful undercurrent that reshapes the workplace atmosphere, fostering a more inclusive, collaborative, and united team spirit. It is a key to excellent leadership.
The Psychology Behind “We” vs. “I”
Language is a reflection of our thoughts and attitudes. When a leader consistently uses “I” in their communication, it can unintentionally project a sense of self-centrism, isolation, and even authoritarianism. This creates a psychological barrier between the leader and their team, suggesting a top-down approach where ideas and directives flow in one direction only.
Conversely, “We” statements signify a collective mindset. They convey a sense of shared responsibility, mutual goals, and collective effort. This subtle linguistic shift can transform perceptions within a team, making members feel more valued, involved, and committed to shared objectives.
Building a Collaborative Culture
A leader’s choice of words can either build walls or bridges. “We” statements are bridge-builders. They foster an environment of collaboration and teamwork. When a leader says, “We need to improve our performance,” instead of “I want better results,” it implicates everyone in the success and challenges of the team, promoting a culture where each member feels responsible and empowered to contribute.
Enhancing Team Morale and Ownership
Using “We” instills a sense of ownership and pride among team members. It suggests that every individual’s contribution is vital to the collective success. This inclusivity boosts morale, as team members feel they are integral to the organization’s journey, not just cogs in a wheel.
Encouraging Open Communication and Feedback
Leaders who use “We” statements are seen as more approachable and open to ideas and feedback. This approachability fosters an environment where team members feel comfortable sharing their thoughts, leading to a more innovative and dynamic workplace.
Challenges and Considerations
While the shift from “I” to “We” can be powerful, it has challenges. Overuse or inappropriate use of “We” can sometimes dilute personal accountability or mask who is responsible for decision-making. Leaders must balance “We” with clear communication about roles, responsibilities, and accountability.
The Future of Leadership Language
The language of leadership is also changing. Increasingly, successful leaders can create a sense of community and joint purpose among their team members. The transition from “I” to “We” is not just a linguistic change but a reflection of a deeper, more fundamental shift in leadership philosophy – from individualism to collectivism, from command to collaboration.
#LeadershipLanguage #TeamDynamics #CollaborativeCulture #InclusiveLeadership #EmpoweringTeams #CommunicationSkills #LeadershipDevelopment #Teamwork #OrganizationalCulture
Micro-teams in Multifamily Leadership: Catalyst for Innovation or Stress Inducers?
Photo by Jaime Spaniol on Unsplash
Today, the mantra seems to be ‘divide and conquer.’ With companies increasingly adopting agile methodologies married around centralization, micro-teams have emerged as the go-to strategy for many leaders. But is the buzz around these small, agile teams justifiable, or are they inadvertently breeding grounds for micro-stress among leaders and teams?
Let’s begin by understanding the essence of a micro-team. Typically comprised of 3-5 members, these teams are designed to be self-sufficient, semi-autonomous, and hyper-focused on a specific task or project. They operate under the idea that smaller groups can produce results faster with fewer mistakes, adapt quicker to changes, and foster a more intimate collaborative environment.
However enticing as they sound, micro-teams can also be a double-edged sword. The autonomy they are granted requires an impeccable level of trust between members, which, if mismanaged, can quickly turn into a stress hotbed.
Communication is paramount. With fewer members, miscommunication or lack of transparency can lead to significant setbacks. There’s little room for ambiguity; every member must always be on their A-game.
The pressure to deliver can be intense. In larger teams, there’s often a diffusion of responsibility. But in micro-teams, each individual’s contributions are clear as day.
For leaders, especially in the multifamily space, ensuring these teams stay cohesive and stress-free becomes paramount.
So, how can you leverage micro-teams’ power without falling into the pitfalls of microstress?
- Open Channels of Communication: Engage in regular check-ins and ensure team members are emotionally balanced and aligned on tasks.
- Provide Clarity: Set clear expectations. Ambiguity is a micro-team’s Achilles heel.
- Empower, Don’t Micromanage: Autonomy is the strength of a micro-team. Leaders should guide but not dictate every move.
- Encourage Breaks and Downtime: Mental well-being is crucial. Encourage micro-teams to take breaks and destress. This is especially important in a remote work environment.
- Invest in Proper Technology: Harness the power of technology tools. Whether it’s management software or communication platforms, these tools can streamline tasks and reduce operational stress.
- Human-centric Leadership: Remember, a micro-team is not just about efficiency; it’s about people. Adopting a human-centric leadership approach is pivotal.
For leaders who’ve always believed in the might of large teams, transitioning to a micro-team setup can be daunting. But, the right strategies can make a significant difference in results. It’s all about striking a balance. Understand the nuances of your micro-teams trust in their capabilities, but always keep an eye out for signs of stress.
In leadership, where human-centric values intersect with cutting-edge strategies, there’s always room for innovative, albeit sometimes contrarian, ideas. Maybe, just maybe, micro-teams are the future.
But tread with caution.
Unified Vision: The Keystone of Multifamily Leadership
Photo by Nathan Dumlao on Unsplash
Hyper-targeted strategies and competition sometimes cause us to forget a fundamental building block to success: a unified goal. But as multifamily leaders know, tech advancements and business innovations are for if their organization’s culture lacks a clear, shared objective.
Every extraordinary business, especially in the multifamily space, thrives on the cohesion of its team. An aligned goal is not just about setting a NOI or Revenue target. It’s about defining the company’s very essence, the values it stands by, and the legacy it seeks to leave. This holistic definition ensures that every strategy executed, every decision made, and every innovation adopted serves this common purpose.
Why is this so vital? First, a shared goal boosts team morale. When team members understand and embrace the company’s mission, they are more motivated, committed, and passionate. This energy translates into purpose-driven productivity, a stronger drive for ideation, and an unwavering commitment to excellence.
Moreover, in business, where human-centricity is paramount, having a clear goal ensures all strategies are people-focused. When the end goal is not just about NOI or ROI but about creating extraordinary living experiences, improving community connections, or maximizing resident satisfaction, every business move becomes more meaningful.
Furthermore, a unified goal acts as a beacon in times of adversity. The multifamily market will always pose challenges with fluctuating demands, tech disruptions, and ever-changing resident expectations. In such scenarios, having a clear and shared objective offers a direction, a North Star, guiding the team when faced with difficult decisions.
Yet, it’s not just about setting a goal; it’s about effective communication. A goal locked in the boardroom and not understood by the entire organization loses its efficacy. Leaders must ensure that this vision is communicated and deeply understood, resonated with, and adopted by every individual.
.
